Plasma International and Blood Plasma Transfusions Case Study

Plasma International and Blood Plasma Transfusions - Case Study ExampleBlood most especially the one and only(a) provided through acquireations by third world countries at a low price should not be sold back to them at exorbitant prices. Blood should be procurable to anyone at any time without charge or obligation because donors dont gain preference over non-donors.I dont scoff with the writer because human blood, just like any other human body part should come at a price. People pay to knock back their kidneys, arms, eyes knees even heart valves. Just like blood other body parts are as important so I dont see why when it comes to the donation of blood it should be different. Just because blood comes from human who can continuously produce more, doesnt mean one can collect it freely(Zimmer.Preston n.d) There are many things involved before, during and after someone is transfused with blood that is pricely. Starting with purchasing needles, collection bags, sterilizers, vacuum c ontainers, equipment for laboratory interrogatory to verify the purity of the blood. Medical practitioners, as well as the supplies they use like lab coats, latex gloves, and protective equipment, need to be purchased. Also, transportation cost from the donor to the recipient should not be left out. According to me, its not unethical if the company keeps the price to receive donor blood low-cost to the recipient. And as long as it operates legally, its fine with me. After all, medicine nowadays is profit generating as any other. The existence of blood market does not threaten the right to donate freely (Zimmer.Preston (n.d)There are facts that contradict my argument, the fact that marketing threatens all rights to receive freely donated blood. The commercialization of blood discourages intended blood donors someone will be reluctant to donate freely knowing very well that someone will be financially paying out of it (Paying donors and the ethics of blood supply. n.d.).Still, it s eems likely thatwhen suppliers get paid, the would-be non-cash donor losses the sense that their contribution is necessary (Guceri, Fridman & North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2008).